Neoco’s blog - keep up to date with the best digital marketing agency in the world!


Rise of blogger arrests

The University of Washington’s World Information Access report (WIA) has shown that since 2003, at least 64 people have been arrested for blogging about political issues - for exposing corruption in goverment, the abuse of human rights or for just generally criticising governments. In 2008, it is likely that more bloggers than ever will face arrest as a result of the growing political importance of blogging. 

More than half of all the arrests have been made in China, Egypt and Iran with prison sentences given to many. The average prison sentence for blogging was 15 months and the longest sentence found by the WIA was eight years!

Its not just the Middle East bloggers though - in the last four years, British, French, Canadian and American bloggers have also been arrested.  Arrests tend to increase during times of political uncertainty - so with upcoming elections in China, Pakistan, Iran and the US, arrests are predicted to high an all time high.

For more details about the report visit http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7456357.stm



Web’s impact on journalism

We’ve just come across a really nice article, explaining how the web has impacted  journalism. The article, written by independent journalist, Bill Thompson, outlines some of the key changes relating to news online, and how they have affected journalism. These include:

  • Blogging turning from a ‘curious habit of the self-obsessed into a defining use of the internet for all forms of communication’
  • News feeds, aggregators and personal recommendations on social network sites replacing the front pages of major news providers, as the way that people find out about breaking news
  • The Guardian moving from a newspaper with a nice website, to an online information source that also publishes a dead tree edition
  • New services like Twitter offering alternative ways of getting the news, in the form of short updates about breaking news or links to longer pieces

In terms of the future of journalism, a key thinking point from the article came from a comment made by Solana Larsen, one of the managing editors of Global Voices (a site that offers easy access to many of the world’s bloggers and tries to “aggregate, curate, and amplify the global conversation online”). She believes that in 5 years time, the “foreign correspondent” - sent off to a strange land to report on the activities of the “natives” - will no longer be needed. The main reason being that there are becoming more and more places online where we can simply ask those who are living through the events what they think of them, and seek insights and analysis from those who know the people and the places involved.

Whether you agree with this or not, the full article is definitely worth a look: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7338238.stm



To blog or not to blog
October 17, 2007, 12:18 pm
Filed under: Brands & Marketing | Tags: , ,

shakespeare.jpg
When the Digital Training Academy ran one of their Social Media training events, I dropped by to share some thoughts about how you can measure and track performance in social media. At Neoco we’re big fans of blogging, but most firms still make a hash of it, failing to listen to their markets and failing to create anything beyond the turgid junk of your average press release. You can find out some of the stuff we got up to in the Online Classroom for the Digital Blogging Academy.
…and if you want to know more about how blogs boost business, then just give us a call. Hey, you could even leave a message here on our blog ;-)



Social objects and eggs
October 15, 2007, 12:20 pm
Filed under: Brands & Marketing | Tags: , , ,

socialobjectsandeggs.gif
Breakfast today consisted of a very interesting chat with Hugh Macleod (pictured above). Hugh is a guru amongst the blogoshphere and is also infamous for his Microsoft blue monster series of cartoons.

One of the key topics discussed was about monetising blogging and the metrics behind it but soon we were talking about social objects and how they are used by audiences to define others (and themselves). This is why Facebook is so successful as it enables people to talk about the relationships they have with each other through objects. Conversation has moved on from ‘when are you going on holiday next?’ to ‘your holiday in Croatia looked great - how was it’. Whilst many people debate the ‘artificial-ness’ of relationships formed on Facebook and other social networking sites, the fact is that they are formed through a very natural process of having a connection or similarity to another person and discussing it. It also helps you cover ground on the relationship early as the social object you discuss (playstation, iphone, whatever) also says a lot about the brands you buy or your social position. Suddenly, the ‘we met through Facebook’ button does not look so weird, right?



Facebook: It Will Pass (or The Web is Not Only 3b5998)
July 24, 2007, 5:04 pm
Filed under: Cool & Online | Tags: , ,

ivanpope.jpg
Today, I am pleased to upload a guest entry to the neoco blog by Ivan Pope - the British ‘been there and done that’ web guru. This is a terrific read and well worth the 5 mins of reading time. Thanks Ivan. On with the show…

“Driving home late last night I was listening to a radio program about whether there is such a thing as the Zeitgeist and how we recognise it.
This made me think about Facebook and the current obsessive coverage that the site gets from the blogosphere and whether we really are seeing something that will grow to become a key part of the internet, or whether it’s just a case of zeitgeist mania.
Following the launch of the Facebook f8 platform, discussion of MySpace (the previous zeitgeist candidate) has dropped to zero (does it still exist, has anyone been over to look recently, maybe we should send a searchparty out just in case) and Facebook has become the dominant theme. Far reaching claims have been made for the power, beauty and all consuming glory of Facebook, including that it’s become the operating system of the internet, that it’s the new Google and that it will be bought for $6bn by Microsoft. I’m not going to argue about it’s potential value, anything that claims our attention and obsession the way Facebook has no doubt has a huge value. But I’m interested in the value to you and me, to the millions of individual users. I love hanging out on Facebook, but I’m not sure I’ve found out what it does yet. And it seems the more I look, the less I find. I’m beginning to get the feeling that Facebook is only fun for tracking the now, the mememe moment. It’s great to see all your friends arrive and add friends and add applications and … then?

As Facebook continues its march to total world domination, for the record I’d like to articulate why I don’t think it’s going to happen. It’s a zeitgeisty thing - we’re all talking about Facebook so we’re all talking about Facebook. But can Facebook sustain our interest over the next year?

The Web is something rich and strange and Facebook not something rich and strange.
Back in 1988 before the Web arrived we used to play a lot of image based games around the internet, passing encoded images back and forth and basically working hard to make some sense of this dark network where
no-one could see anyone else. From that point on for me the internet and the web have been a rich and strange playground where each new person, each new application, each new network, added something
unknowable to the sum total of where we worked and played. Facebook doesn’t really do any of that. It’s a nice tidy ‘burb where everyone has more or less the same house, same garden, same car, same attitude.
Sure, we can all add friends and join networks and add applications, but it’s always clear that there is no curtain behind which strange things might lurk. Facebook is the uber controlled environment - useful and wanted by many, but not pregnant with potential.

There are only so many new people
Facebook is experiencing a huge wave of migration. This is held up as proof of the genius of Zuckerberg, and indeed in many ways they have played a blinder. From a closed College based network, they have taken a gamble to open up to anyone and everyone and seen it play off bigtime. The viral nature of Facebook is supreme, with member get member raised to a new artform. I’ve read dozens of articles about how all of someone’s friends have arrived in Facebook in the very recent past, usually in a great splurge of arrivals as a single outrider reports back to the group that, yup, it looks safe in here and there are lush pastures for the cattle. Then everyone else takes up residence, and as they overlap with other social groups, the process repeats itself. There is something engaging and exciting about arriving in an easy to understand social network, with tools to explore and people to Poke (ooh, the underlying sexual thrill of it all, it reminds me of my first disco, I didn’t know what that was all about either, but by god it turned me on). Face it, when someone invites you to join Facebook and be their friend, its a cheap thrill to sign up and be that friend.

Call that a network?
I live in Brighton & Hove, East Sussex, UK. So for some reason that’s my network. It has 54,384 members who, I guess, live in Brighton and Hove. The total population of Brighton is 247,820, which means my network contains approximately one sixth of the entire population of this town. There are only 117032 15 to 44 year olds, which means that almost 50% of them are members of my local network. Huh? I mean, this is some kind of groovy town, but I find that rather unlikely.
More to the point, what the hell am I supposed to do with a network that includes every single sentient being between the ages of fifteen and forty-five in my town? I see I can go to a costume making event at 2pm or *GUILDFORD MONDAY NITE* at 7pm (that’s Guildford, not Brighton, but hey). Popular in Brighton and Hove includes the facebook wide food fight and Brighton’s Largest Water Fight. The Discussion Board has 164 discussion topics, starting with ‘How Many Ways To Say I Love You?’, but frankly life’s too short. And then there’s The Wall. 754 posts starting with a bit of spam from Ben Williams.
To say the will to live deserted me at this point would be an exaggeration, but to say the will to live in Brighton and Hove fled my feeble frame just about sums it up. Why am I in this network? I am a sophisticated online denizen, I partake of and participate in hundreds of online societies and fora of all kinds. Some are good, some are bad, some are essential to life. But none are as depressingly pointless as this all consuming Brighton and Hove Network.
And yes, I know I can change my regional network, but what exactly would be the point of that? I quite like seeing my local friends’ faces peering out at me from the sidebar - but that’s not quite enough to make it worthwhile.
I guess this approach worked quite well when it was a college based network, but imagine what it is like to be a London or Shanghai network member - they’ve elevated inanity to a whole new level.

Give me my tools back
I’m used to some level of sophistication in my toolset. I don’t mind using your online tools, after all, it’s your community. But ffs, all I can do in my Groups is write on the wall? And then you can write on the same wall back to me. I can upload photos? Every time someone does something, I get sent an email without the content. There just are no sophisticated tools in Facebook - everything is like a shallow version of what we’re used to on the outside. For sure, the apps have started to put some depth back into the system, but it’s hard to imagine that we’ll en masse abandon our email and our IM and our other contact and memory tools and use the stubs that Facebook offers. Not for a while anyway, we’ll get disillusioned and wonder off as our attention drifts.

Did you know there are other colours?
I know this will sound very shallow and pathetic, but I really can’t imagine living with 3b5998 only for the rest of my life. As someone who was working with the web when there was not even any right align, let alone fancy layouts or the CSS wonders we see today, it pains me to have to use such a limited interface. With respect, it is the sort of interface that the East German government would have commissioned for their citizen network if they had lived to see in the true glory of the web. Where I come from we call this colour Navy Blue and with good reason, children grow up to hate it. Allied to the fixed layout, 3b5998 is the antithesis of everything that design stands for and everything that the web has taught us - that we are individuals and that we make and remake our environment to work with our needs and desires. Even Google, that great interface reducer, has relented and offered multiple funky interfaces to their start pages. So what’s with the fascist control freakery? Don’t you trust me to change things the way I like em? think I might, like, go mad with funky colours? So what, that’s my freedom.

All this is not to say that I don’t enjoy Facebook - it’s been a blast. I’ve got on with it so much better than I ever did with MySpace. It’s calm and clean and pleasant. It’s just that, after a while, I start to wonder where all the there is. What can I actually do with this stuff, apart from add my voice to a list of comments on a wall and show off my nous by adding new apps, knowing that all my mates will see me adding it. Then I can have a little thrill when I notice them in return joining my Groups or adding my apps. See, it’s a bit ego driven, but after the thrill comes not very much at all. So here’s to a long life for Facebook. Facebook has become the zeitgeist for a few months. But our attention will wander. It’s not Google. It won’t change our lives. It won’t become the centre of all we do online, adding a new layer of amazement. Google did that. Facebook is just another thing to play with.”

You can find Ivan on FB by clicking here!
You can submit your own entry for consideration to the neoco blog - just email us.